Abandoning gold in 1931 was a dramatic admission that the old promise could not hold. Britain left gold in September 1931 amid pressure on sterling and the wider interwar monetary system.
Notifications
Clear all
The gold commitment constrained policy responses at a time of severe economic uncertainty. Defending the exchange rate came with painful domestic constraints.
The departure was a dramatic monetary change, but its effects unfolded within a broader international depression. Breaking a monetary rule is only the start of an adjustment.
Political blame should not obscure how the mechanism actually worked. A documentary must distinguish political blame from the economic mechanisms that made defending the exchange rate difficult.
Would leaving earlier have helped, or damaged trust sooner?